Security & AuditsSecurity Audit Summary

Mage Labs Security Audit Summary

Overview

Mage Labs has undergone comprehensive security audits from multiple independent firms, covering both our DEX and staking protocols. This page provides a detailed overview of all security assessments and their outcomes.

For information about our security framework, testing methodology, and ongoing security practices, see our Security Measures page.

Audit Timeline

2025 Audit Progression

  1. May 2025: Mage DEX Security Audit (Audita)
  2. June 2025: Initial Staking Audit (Cyberscope)
  3. July 2025: Staking Audit Phase 2 (Cyberscope)
  4. July 2025: Staking Audit Phase 3 (Cyberscope)
  5. July 2025: Chain-Fox DEX Preliminary Audit

Detailed Audit Reports

1. Audita DEX Security Audit (May 2025)

  • Auditor: Audita Security
  • Period: May 7-17, 2025
  • Scope: Mage DEX smart contracts
  • Network: Solana
  • Language: Rust
  • Method: Manual Audit

Findings Summary

SeverityCountStatus
Critical0-
High0-
Medium2Resolved
Low4Resolved
Informational4Resolved

Key Findings

  • MAGE-01: Observations insufficient for TWAP calculation (Medium) - RESOLVED
  • MAGE-02: TWAP Oracle may not reflect volatile market prices (Medium) - RESOLVED
  • MAGE-03: Inconsistent access control in fee collection (Low) - RESOLVED
  • MAGE-04: Missing fee parameter validation (Low) - RESOLVED

Overall Assessment

“MageLabs DEX is, to the best of our knowledge, safe to use.”

2. Cyberscope Staking Audits (June-July 2025)

Initial Audit (June 2025)

  • Auditor: Cyberscope
  • Period: June 2025
  • Scope: Mage Labs Staking Protocol
  • Findings: 7 Critical, 7 Medium, 16 Minor/Informative

Phase 2 Audit (July 2025)

  • Auditor: Cyberscope
  • Period: July 2025
  • Findings: 2 Critical, 2 Medium, 15 Minor/Informative

Phase 3 Audit (July 2025)

  • Auditor: Cyberscope
  • Period: July 2025
  • Findings: 0 Critical, 0 Medium, 11 Minor/Informative (All resolved)

Staking Audit Progression

PhaseCriticalMediumMinorStatus
Initial7716Resolved
Phase 22215Resolved
Phase 30011All Acknowledged

3. Chain-Fox DEX Preliminary Audit (July 2025)

  • Auditor: Chain-Fox
  • Period: July 19-20, 2025
  • Scope: Mage DEX smart contracts
  • Network: Solana
  • Language: Rust
  • Method: Manual Audit

Key Findings (Implementation in Progress)

  • Closing Accounts Improperly: Issues with account closure without proper marking
  • Missing Ownership Check: Authority validation issues
  • Memory Size Calculation: Using std::mem::size_of instead of INIT_SPACE
  • Pubkey Comparison: Should use require_key_eq instead of require_eq
  • Bad Practices: Not using get() for Sysvars
  • Unhandled Panic: Pervasive use of .unwrap() without error handling
  • Redundant Code: Unused variables
  • Incomplete Comments: Ambiguous or missing documentation

Verification Results

  • check_curve_value_from_swap ✅ Passed verification
  • check_pool_value_from_deposit ✅ Passed verification
  • check_pool_value_from_withdraw ✅ Passed verification

Security Improvements

DEX Protocol

  • Enhanced TWAP oracle implementation
  • Improved fee parameter validation
  • Better access control mechanisms
  • Comprehensive documentation updates
  • Code quality improvements and best practices implementation

Staking Protocol

  • Resolved all critical and medium severity issues
  • Implemented proper reward distribution mechanisms
  • Enhanced NFT validation and weighting
  • Improved access control and validation logic

Audit Reports

Available Reports

Security Status

All Critical and High severity issues resolvedMultiple independent audit firms engagedProgressive security improvements implementedProduction-ready security standards achievedContinuous security monitoring in place

Ongoing Security

Mage Labs maintains a commitment to security through:

  • Regular audit cycles
  • Community bug bounty programs
  • Continuous monitoring systems
  • Transparent security reporting
  • Multi-firm validation approach

Disclaimer

While these audits provide comprehensive security assessments, no audit can guarantee absolute security. Smart contract platforms and their programming languages are not immune to potential vulnerabilities. Multiple independent audits and ongoing security practices are recommended for maximum protection.